| | List |
| Subject: | Re: Changing Java Security Policy |
| Poster: | JoshuaCranmerPidgeot18@epenguin.zzn.com |
| Date: | Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:34:36 GMT |
| Related Postings: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 |
CalAmity! wrote:
> On Mar 23, 5:49 pm, "Andrew Thompson" wrote:
>> On Mar 23, 11:32 pm, "CalAmity!" wrote:
>> ..
>>
>>> Ok - let me elaborate more.
>> Oh, you have decided to 'toss us another
>> morsel of your delicious question', is
>> that it?
>>
>>
>> How nice of you..
>>
>>
>> How about, instead of this cat and mouse
>> crap, you tell us. What you are trying to
>> achieve for the end user? What ability do
>> you wish to deliver to the end user, by
>> 'changing' the security environment after
>> application start-up?
>>
>> Andrew T.
>
> Andrew - you are such an *ASSHOLE*.
> Why don't you SHUT THE FUCK UP if you don't have a solution.
>
> Stop enlightening us with your SILLY remarks!
> Jerk!!
>
They're not silly: they're trying to be informative. "Java security" is
a broad topic, so asking "How do I do XXX in Java security" is often
times too vague to answer fully. By providing more forthcoming
information, the respondents to your questions are able to guide you in
a way that might be more sensibly-minded than a kludgy method by a user
who is less informed of the available APIs.
Included in the rules of good question-asking are:
@ Try to be as complete as possible.
@ Don't try and diagnose your own problem.
Finally, I should add this: there was no warrant for vehemently swearing
at Andrew. He was trying to be helpful, and you just blasted away at
him. Perhaps you might want to listen to your own remarks?
|
|